|
| |
CONFERENCE SPEAKERS -
ABSTRACTS OF PRESENTATIONS
Katrina Wyatt and Robin Durie
Innovation in communities - the conditions for change
The aim of this presentation is to share our understanding of the process of
transformational change which took place in an area of high deprivation in West
Cornwall. Using complexity theory as the evidentiary framework we will show how
an area characterised by isolation and despair has been transformed physically,
economically and socially. Data has been collected through one-to-one
interviews, non-participatory attendance of meetings, access to written
documents and through field note observations and informal conversations. This
presentation will draw upon our understanding gained about the creation of these
enabling conditions producing transformational health, education, police and
housing outcomes.
David Byrne
Representing Complexity - issues for social scientists in providing evidence
for policy and practice in a complex world.
Unless we regard the scientific description of the world as equivalent to the
religious practice of the contemplation of the nature of God, then we do science
to inform social practice - to be used. Since the 16th Century the western
scientific project has attempted to deliver absolute descriptions as the basis
for prediction and hence the development of effective technologies. However,
throughout the history of that project, there has been a continuing expression
of 'reservation' as to the appropriateness of such an approach in domains where
the intentionality of human beings has creative capacity. From Vico through
Dilthey into the social constructionist programme of the twentieth century,
voices have been raised saying 'the human sciences are different'. Complexity
science offers a parallel and related challenge to the predictive claims of
simple science. In brutal summary we can say that both complexity and the
emphasis on human social action assert that prediction as to what will happen
has to be replaced by understanding of what can be made to happen. This has the
crucial corollary that different things can be made to happen. This presentation
will explore the implications of these fundamental points for both 'evidence
based practice' and the evidence informed development of policies in the public
domain. To a considerable extent the emphasis on evidence has been understood as
enabling the replacement of political determination of crucial social issues
with the technical resolution of social problems. The contrary argument advanced
here is that what complexity theory requires is a scientifically informed
politics in which real and probably incommensurate interests are informed as to
the alternative futures which can be created on the basis of the present AND as
to what interventions and practices will produce which futures. The argument
will be illustrated by reference to the role of complexity theory in urban
policy and planning.
Paul Stevens
Getting value from IT - can complexity help?
Following the merger of GlaxoWellcome and SmithKlineBeecham in 2001, the IT
department within the UK commercial company determined to adopt a radically new
approach to IT. This approach focused the whole department on the generation of
value and led to the adoption of new ideas and ways of working that have forged
a close alignment with other business areas. This close working relationship has
allowed the company to use IT as a truly strategic tool to become the only
Pharma company in the UK to adopt a different way of competing in the market
place, and consequently to greatly increase sales. My talk will recount the
changes that were made in IT and how they emerged from a simple set of
direction-setting ideas, and will attempt to relate this to Complexity theory.
Robert Geyer
Is there anything to fear from the politics of complexity?
From a complexity perspective, many of the worst human excesses of the twentieth
century were constructed and justified by an approach to human beings founded on
a deterministic orderly linear paradigm. Whether this was cloaked in a communist
ideology, the horrors of the an agricultural collectivization policy that killed
10-20 million in the 1930s, a free market ideology, the tragedy of the
catastrophic impact of rigid IMF/World Bank policy towards 3rd world debt, or a
planning ideology, the appalling urban housing policies of the 1960s, the
fundamentally linear mechanistic approach doomed millions to suffer under the
constraints of politicians and bureaucrats convinced of the certainty and
"scientific" foundation of their actions. Now, if Stephen Hawkings is
correct and the 21st century is the century of complexity, what are its
political implications and should we be worried about them?
Damian Allen
Complexity and Educational Change
The Borough of Knowsley is the third most deprived in Great Britain, and
educational achievement is historically well below national expectations. A
series of change initiatives have been implemented in recent years to improve
educational achievement, which have resulted in significant improvements,
particularly at age 16. The magnitude of this was recognised by the award of
Beacon status for 'Transforming Secondary Education' in 2003-04. The
preponderance of the undertaking has been with the educational system as a
whole, rather than with individual institutions. These changes have been managed
with reference to the concepts of complex adaptive systems, and the learning
from these changes will be shared. The next series of challenges, focusing
around the creation of a new learning system, made possible by the Building
Schools for the Future programme, will be examined.
|